Log in

View Full Version : 3G rollout problems world wide.



3g-g
26th April 2005, 12:30 AM
You may of read the other post (https://talk3g.co.uk/showthread.php?t=404) I placed earler about Bank of America doing a deal with one of the US operators to place masts at each BofA site. It seems like a worldwide problem the upgrading and rollout of the new 3G networks... which i find quite worrying. The bad feeling of the public towards the new sites, and the poor delivery of good & new UMTS/3G handsets worldwide must surely be getting the network operators in a bit of a tizzy. Can 3G emulate the success of GSM? Or are we all destined to be stuck with patchy 3G coverage for a long time to come? They're having the same problems in Oz (downunder that is, not where Dorothy & the tin man went).

Reported in The Australian:

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,15084775%255E643,00.html


OPTUS will launch its new third-generation network in Canberra tomorrow, becoming the second company to offer 3G mobile services in Australia.

But Optus will not have the service available elsewhere until October, amid teething problems with its network rollout.

The move comes as shrinking mobile revenue growth has forced the No2 mobile player to cut back spending on its existing GSM network, which services 6.2 million customers.

The rollout of Optus's 3G service - offering the promise of video calls and internet-based applications - follows the launch of Hutchison's "3" service in 2003. Telstra and Vodafone plan to launch their 3G services later this year.

Optus is building a 3G network with Vodafone, while Telstra last year paid $450 million for 50 per cent of the existing Hutchison network.

Optus insiders say the company's 3G network, named Project Spinoza, needs to have its network sites complete by the end of June to allow radio network tests to start on August 1 and finish by September 30.

But the company is arguing with the owners of mobile tower sites over the introduction of 3G network equipment.

"Private landowners (are) not too happy to be told by Optus that they're putting more antennas on their roof without paying them any more rent," one source said. Most mobile tower leases have a clause stating they can install up to six antennas, however, on the 2G network, most only have three antennas.

Sources also said that Optus's budget of $150 million to upgrade 330 2G sites nationally had been halved in February by its parent, Singapore Telecommunications, and only 160 sites would be upgraded in the financial year ending March 31, 2006.

Optus and Vodafone plan to launch 3G services in Sydney and Melbourne in October but their network will have half the coverage of their rivals' networks.

Optus was planning 1000 network sites and Vodafone 500 but it was unclear how many of these would operate by October, a source said. The partners will then roll out 3G in Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth for commercial services in 2006.

Hutchison already has more than 2000 sites and Telstra has started work on more sites to add to the joint network in regional areas such as Canberra. Telstra is targeting July for its 3G launch.

Optus will only have deployed a minimum number of base stations in Canberra to start the service, company sources said. This risks creating a phenomenon referred to by network engineers as "swiss cheese", due to the fact that it will have holes.

The mass market remains unconvinced about the benefits of 3G and rich data services on mobiles.

Two years after launching, "3" has only 500,000 of Australia's 18 million mobile users. Data services on so-called 2.5G networks from Telstra, Optus and Vodafone have also struggled to find users.

3GScottishUser
26th April 2005, 07:21 AM
An interesting article that seems to highlight the problem for 3G.

The big question now that the technology is becoming more widesperad is 'Will people pay to use it?' Setting aside the separate issue of new entrants buying customers (this has nothing to do with the technology really) what seems to be required is that 'killer application' that every technology needs to find favour and gain widespread approval from the paying public.

It follows that mobile networks will migrate customers to their more efficient 3G networks over time but if folks simply use the new networks for the same purpose as the GSM ones all of the investment in higher capacity/higher speed technology will have been wasted. Buying 3G licences for the incumbents appers to have been a 'dammed if you do and dammed if you dont' prospect but buying into 3G will have guaranteed those who already have significant market share some continuity and a share of future developments.

The latter 'developments' look pretty specialist as yet and until the 'killer application' appears it looks likely that 3G will limp along being bought for all the wrong reasons by lots of customers who simply don't know or care what they have bought as long as its cheap.

The real 3G prize will go to the networks who innovate and offer 'must have' extras that customers will be happy to pay a premium for.