Hands0n
4th March 2006, 09:45 PM
While not strictly 3G, it is considered in the industry that the network is the appropriate carrier for IM due to its low[er than 2G] latency and higher speeds.
Will IM be the 3G "magic bullet" that all the operators have been looking for? Certainly, their forecasts are [perhaps wildly] optimistic. But if they do indeed pan out then there will be a lot of ARPU coming in to the mobops coffers. I do tend to think that IM via mobile will be a big hit, particularly among the younger generation who practially live on the stuff via their PCs.
Steve Ballmer told the audience of 3GSM recently that Microsoft should be considered a friend, not a foe, of the global mobile operator community.
"We come as friends. We see opportunity to change the world together in a positive way." One positive way was something else he demonstrated at the show, the use of VoIP over Microsoft Office Communicator, due to be released this year on a mobile phone.
No mobile audience can consider a company a friend if it threatens multiple future revenue streams, and in another part of the 3GSM audience, 15 of the leading non-US cellular carriers were plotting to launch their own statement on standardised interoperable instant messengers, a move that is meant to slam the mobile door in the face of not just Microsoft, but also AOL, Yahoo, Google and, of course, Skype, the carriers current "bête noire".
Investment analysts globally shuddered at the prospect of VoIP getting some kind of free ride over mobile services, and nodded sagely as the 15 leading mobile operators responded by promising IM interoperability and fast.
Almost as if to remind everyone of the danger, Hutchinson Whampoas 3 mobile carrier announced that it was now supporting Skype on a mobile, and finally the panic was almost perfect.
Now, two weeks later Vodafone, added to the angst surrounding mobile operators by taking a £28bn ($49bn) write down of assets, mostly associated with its German operations, which it said were over valued. Vodafone also said that excluding acquisitions and disposals mobile growth would be just 5 per cent to 6.5 per cent in the year to 31 March 2007, a dramatic drop on previous forecasts. Vodafone shares dropped about 6.5 per cent on the day, and have fallen a total of 12.5 per cent since we last issued a Faultline Fifty analysis (see separate story and spreadsheet) a month ago, to a three year low.
While this Vodafone hiccup doesnt relate to IM in any direct way, Vodafone, as the global leader in mobile, sets the tone for the entire industry, and right now must feel it needs friends like Microsoft about as much as it needs a hole in its balance sheet. It will take the view that it has to secure any and all revenues on its network that are going, for itself, and not share them with any newcomer from the software or internet world. It needs growth revenues urgently, and IM is potentially the most promising place to look. There are billions of IM messages placed each month with the AOL network alone, carrying around 800m IM messages each day and that success is set to shift onto mobile.
Today there are estimated to be only 12m IM mobile customers in the world, but this number is expected to double every year for at least the next four years.
Microsofts Telco team has just recorded a win with Beijing Mobile, part of the China Mobile group, where the Microsoft Live Communications Server is supporting an IM client written by China Mobile.
The sign ups in a market not known for high SMS usage, are happening at the rate of 10,000 per day and have reached multiple millions of customers. It is this kind of growth that all of the 15 declaring cellcos, China Mobile among them, are chasing.
These include Vodafone, Orange, T-Mobile, China Mobile, O2, Telefonica and Turkcell and others, between them covering 700m mobile phone users, which have agreed in principle to use a the GSM Association standard for IM, compatible across all networks, from some point later in 2006.
Vodafone and Orange also said that they want to be the first to get interoperability working, while Orange plans to offer a common IM service between Orange and Wanadoo broadband customers.
The most important discernible difference between SMS and IM messaging is the fact that it is real time and that other underlying data delivery services can be launched on the back of an IM server.
3G networks are more than capable of handling real time data services now with increased total bandwidth and lower latency and this move will mean that development of interfaces which arrange messages into separate conversational threads rather than in strict order of arrival. And IM traffic can be opened up to groups, and is not just about conversations between two individuals.
Shut out portals to whip up ARPU
One of the people we reached out to, to explain the potentially debilitating effects of IM going wrong for the big cellcos was Tommy Volsen, head of marketing and one of the founders of Followap Telecommunications, the company that it is providing the ability for Vodafones Instant Messaging service to interconnect with other IM systems, a deal that was also announced at the 3GSM show.
"Since that announcement at 3GSM I can tell you that 62 interconnect agreements have been signed among the various mobile operators, Volsen began. "They are now positioning instant messaging as next generation SMS after struggling for three years with MMS (multimedia messaging service). Mobile email is bringing the operators negligible revenue and they are now moving at record speed. The connectivity for SMS took ages, but there is a real will behind the IM declaration, and this will happen fast.
"This is because all cellular operators everywhere feel threatened by internet based IMs. In Europe the cellcos have the right to block them, in the US its different and major carriers have offered branded IM on virtually every device.
"The problem with letting someone elses IM on your mobile is that you have to open up an IP route in and out of your device to a remote server, and from that point on it can act as a launching platform for other services," Volsen said.
"In the US the operators had no SMS revenues to speak of and thought they didnt have much to lose. But suddenly the IM suppliers have incorporated pictures, ringtones and blogging on their phones, and as you can see, next step is voice and video through the IM client.
We have already received requests from US operators looking to review their strategy and try something like these non-US operators, and put their own interoperable IM system on their phone. But it wont be easy," he said.
As for the Skype move onto the 3 network, Volsen thinks its just hype. "As I understand it, the move by 3 Sweden to offer a flat rate plus Skype, but it is only for PC cards, not handsets. In effect they are offering Skype on the PC with the connection going through the cellular network rather than say a Wi-fi hotspot. They have to pay for the data connection separately and this will actually cost more than using their phone to call directly, except for international calls made from a consumer's home country.
"It is disastrously inefficient, and will consume half a megabit per hour just to have the Skype client open. This is because the presence updating in Skype has not been altered for cellular, and it continually polls the device."
IM-based VoIP, such as Skype, and video conferencing, hardly ever works unchanged on a mobile service. There are issues for the network managing things like quality of service, and also when a customer roams, suddenly all packets addressed to the client have to divert to a new destination at another base station. This needs operator controlled complex MPLS style tunneling, to get it there fast enough, and Cellcos are hardly going to accommodate this for a portal thats getting a free ride on its network, whereas they will for their own traffic.
"But it is Skype on a mobile that is one of the many things that has forced this IM declaration. Right now 3 is not in the IM alliance. Once IM is deployed in volume it will become the launching pad for video, VoIP and multimedia calls, just as Push to talk promised to be. People need presence information (what my buddies are up to right now)," and he listed key elements:
Communication, through text, voice and video
To share presence information
content delivery
"There is a lot of expectation here. If there are only 100m users of IM, the cellcos will count it as a failure."
As for the Followap product line, work kicked off on that around 1999, was completed in November 2000. It was first deployed by what is now Vodafone Ireland, followed by Vodafone Omnitel and its next job was connecting all the Vodafone subsidiaries so their customers could all IM each other from country to country. Vodafone has since added free IM roaming.
The system is also federated into the MSN network, and now Vodafone customers can IM with MSN users without having an MSN username, instead the individual is identified by a mobile number and can have their own nickname. It will work in much the same way, with the underlying principle of calling party pays. So even sending out of MSN to a mobile IM will cost money, with pre-purchased credits bought in the 100s of messages, for a very small fee.
Already Volsen says all the majors in France are moving ahead, with the France Telecom-owned Orange, Bouygues Telecom and SFR (Vodafone and Vivendi Cegetel owned) already switching their IM through Followap servers.
Article source --> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/02/cellcos_prepare_for_im/
Will IM be the 3G "magic bullet" that all the operators have been looking for? Certainly, their forecasts are [perhaps wildly] optimistic. But if they do indeed pan out then there will be a lot of ARPU coming in to the mobops coffers. I do tend to think that IM via mobile will be a big hit, particularly among the younger generation who practially live on the stuff via their PCs.
Steve Ballmer told the audience of 3GSM recently that Microsoft should be considered a friend, not a foe, of the global mobile operator community.
"We come as friends. We see opportunity to change the world together in a positive way." One positive way was something else he demonstrated at the show, the use of VoIP over Microsoft Office Communicator, due to be released this year on a mobile phone.
No mobile audience can consider a company a friend if it threatens multiple future revenue streams, and in another part of the 3GSM audience, 15 of the leading non-US cellular carriers were plotting to launch their own statement on standardised interoperable instant messengers, a move that is meant to slam the mobile door in the face of not just Microsoft, but also AOL, Yahoo, Google and, of course, Skype, the carriers current "bête noire".
Investment analysts globally shuddered at the prospect of VoIP getting some kind of free ride over mobile services, and nodded sagely as the 15 leading mobile operators responded by promising IM interoperability and fast.
Almost as if to remind everyone of the danger, Hutchinson Whampoas 3 mobile carrier announced that it was now supporting Skype on a mobile, and finally the panic was almost perfect.
Now, two weeks later Vodafone, added to the angst surrounding mobile operators by taking a £28bn ($49bn) write down of assets, mostly associated with its German operations, which it said were over valued. Vodafone also said that excluding acquisitions and disposals mobile growth would be just 5 per cent to 6.5 per cent in the year to 31 March 2007, a dramatic drop on previous forecasts. Vodafone shares dropped about 6.5 per cent on the day, and have fallen a total of 12.5 per cent since we last issued a Faultline Fifty analysis (see separate story and spreadsheet) a month ago, to a three year low.
While this Vodafone hiccup doesnt relate to IM in any direct way, Vodafone, as the global leader in mobile, sets the tone for the entire industry, and right now must feel it needs friends like Microsoft about as much as it needs a hole in its balance sheet. It will take the view that it has to secure any and all revenues on its network that are going, for itself, and not share them with any newcomer from the software or internet world. It needs growth revenues urgently, and IM is potentially the most promising place to look. There are billions of IM messages placed each month with the AOL network alone, carrying around 800m IM messages each day and that success is set to shift onto mobile.
Today there are estimated to be only 12m IM mobile customers in the world, but this number is expected to double every year for at least the next four years.
Microsofts Telco team has just recorded a win with Beijing Mobile, part of the China Mobile group, where the Microsoft Live Communications Server is supporting an IM client written by China Mobile.
The sign ups in a market not known for high SMS usage, are happening at the rate of 10,000 per day and have reached multiple millions of customers. It is this kind of growth that all of the 15 declaring cellcos, China Mobile among them, are chasing.
These include Vodafone, Orange, T-Mobile, China Mobile, O2, Telefonica and Turkcell and others, between them covering 700m mobile phone users, which have agreed in principle to use a the GSM Association standard for IM, compatible across all networks, from some point later in 2006.
Vodafone and Orange also said that they want to be the first to get interoperability working, while Orange plans to offer a common IM service between Orange and Wanadoo broadband customers.
The most important discernible difference between SMS and IM messaging is the fact that it is real time and that other underlying data delivery services can be launched on the back of an IM server.
3G networks are more than capable of handling real time data services now with increased total bandwidth and lower latency and this move will mean that development of interfaces which arrange messages into separate conversational threads rather than in strict order of arrival. And IM traffic can be opened up to groups, and is not just about conversations between two individuals.
Shut out portals to whip up ARPU
One of the people we reached out to, to explain the potentially debilitating effects of IM going wrong for the big cellcos was Tommy Volsen, head of marketing and one of the founders of Followap Telecommunications, the company that it is providing the ability for Vodafones Instant Messaging service to interconnect with other IM systems, a deal that was also announced at the 3GSM show.
"Since that announcement at 3GSM I can tell you that 62 interconnect agreements have been signed among the various mobile operators, Volsen began. "They are now positioning instant messaging as next generation SMS after struggling for three years with MMS (multimedia messaging service). Mobile email is bringing the operators negligible revenue and they are now moving at record speed. The connectivity for SMS took ages, but there is a real will behind the IM declaration, and this will happen fast.
"This is because all cellular operators everywhere feel threatened by internet based IMs. In Europe the cellcos have the right to block them, in the US its different and major carriers have offered branded IM on virtually every device.
"The problem with letting someone elses IM on your mobile is that you have to open up an IP route in and out of your device to a remote server, and from that point on it can act as a launching platform for other services," Volsen said.
"In the US the operators had no SMS revenues to speak of and thought they didnt have much to lose. But suddenly the IM suppliers have incorporated pictures, ringtones and blogging on their phones, and as you can see, next step is voice and video through the IM client.
We have already received requests from US operators looking to review their strategy and try something like these non-US operators, and put their own interoperable IM system on their phone. But it wont be easy," he said.
As for the Skype move onto the 3 network, Volsen thinks its just hype. "As I understand it, the move by 3 Sweden to offer a flat rate plus Skype, but it is only for PC cards, not handsets. In effect they are offering Skype on the PC with the connection going through the cellular network rather than say a Wi-fi hotspot. They have to pay for the data connection separately and this will actually cost more than using their phone to call directly, except for international calls made from a consumer's home country.
"It is disastrously inefficient, and will consume half a megabit per hour just to have the Skype client open. This is because the presence updating in Skype has not been altered for cellular, and it continually polls the device."
IM-based VoIP, such as Skype, and video conferencing, hardly ever works unchanged on a mobile service. There are issues for the network managing things like quality of service, and also when a customer roams, suddenly all packets addressed to the client have to divert to a new destination at another base station. This needs operator controlled complex MPLS style tunneling, to get it there fast enough, and Cellcos are hardly going to accommodate this for a portal thats getting a free ride on its network, whereas they will for their own traffic.
"But it is Skype on a mobile that is one of the many things that has forced this IM declaration. Right now 3 is not in the IM alliance. Once IM is deployed in volume it will become the launching pad for video, VoIP and multimedia calls, just as Push to talk promised to be. People need presence information (what my buddies are up to right now)," and he listed key elements:
Communication, through text, voice and video
To share presence information
content delivery
"There is a lot of expectation here. If there are only 100m users of IM, the cellcos will count it as a failure."
As for the Followap product line, work kicked off on that around 1999, was completed in November 2000. It was first deployed by what is now Vodafone Ireland, followed by Vodafone Omnitel and its next job was connecting all the Vodafone subsidiaries so their customers could all IM each other from country to country. Vodafone has since added free IM roaming.
The system is also federated into the MSN network, and now Vodafone customers can IM with MSN users without having an MSN username, instead the individual is identified by a mobile number and can have their own nickname. It will work in much the same way, with the underlying principle of calling party pays. So even sending out of MSN to a mobile IM will cost money, with pre-purchased credits bought in the 100s of messages, for a very small fee.
Already Volsen says all the majors in France are moving ahead, with the France Telecom-owned Orange, Bouygues Telecom and SFR (Vodafone and Vivendi Cegetel owned) already switching their IM through Followap servers.
Article source --> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/02/cellcos_prepare_for_im/